Someone of the rpm5 developer have problem to discuss general rpm topic, and not only for rpm5 software, on the rpm5 user mailing list ?
FWIW, I have not. I am convinced that rpm5.org might be the best place where a user can get answers on topics rpm and package management in general. At least it was (and it is) my experience, and I have dealt with package/configuration management topic on various OS Unix as a user since 1995. If you also have my own conviction, it would be appropriate to describe this policy of openness - that I think there is always been - on the site rpm5.org. Ok, openess isn't an apropiated term probably, but i do not find a better one now. In reality it was a long time I wanted to say. Thanks for your attention On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Florian Festi <ffe...@redhat.com> wrote: > Jeff Johnson wrote: > >> No reason for moderating my posts other than that "They can." has been > >> supplied. > >> > > > > ... now what is the reason for moderating my posts? > > Aswering users' questions in a way suitable for an rpm5.org list[1] has > earned you this moderation flag. This is an rpm.org mailing list and any > posts that are not relating to rpm.org are off topic[2]. Promoting other > packaging software is definitely off topic. If you want to advertise rpm5 > use an rpm5.org mailing list, please! > > Florian > > [1] Latest example: > http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-list/2008-December/000075.html > [2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/rpm-list/2008-October/msg00022.html > _______________________________________________ > Rpm-list mailing list > rpm-l...@lists.rpm.org > http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list >
