2008/12/22 Per Øyvind Karlsen <pkarl...@rpm5.org> > 2008/12/21 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <ar...@pld-linux.org> > >> On Saturday 20 of December 2008, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote: >> > I've modified DISTTAG tag to be specified in macros file just like >> > DISTRIBUTION, VENDOR etc. >> > and commited it to CVS already. >> > Here's my next step, a DISTEPOCH tag where distribution version can be >> > added. >> > >> > This will change EVR to EVRD which will be represented as >> > %{EPOCH}:%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}:%{DISTEPOCH}, ie. 1:2.3.4-5:2009.1. >> >> In PLD this won't fly because >> 1:2.3.4-5 in "new" devel version of distro can be newer than >> 1:2.3.4-7 in "old" still maintained one. >> >> (versioning is separate for each line) >> >> For now in such case -5 would be bumped to something bigger than in "old" >> version manually. > > So does this mean that for PLD such a DISTEPOCH tag would be the most > significant value rather than least significant? > > Would 1:2.3.4-7 then be a different release other than which distro release > it's > built for? > In Mandriva the packages with the same release are always built from the > same > package between releases, updates etc. of a package in a stable > distribution > is rather given a release like 1:2.3.4-5.1 rather than 1:2.3.4-6.. >
btw. here's some info on release tags in Mandriva Linux: http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Policies/Release_Tag