On Jan 5, 2009, at 12:26 PM, Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
converting on checks as you suggest makes sense to me.
And here's the loaded question:
Do I parameterize strcasecmp into the {N,EVRD,F} comparisons?
BTW this whole implementation (I haven't started with N regexes yet) is
headed towards an addenda for
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/packaging/2008-December/001085.html
I'll trick up RPM "version" specifications however you wish.
But please note that its quite easy to write
# STEP 1: Match the string and capture regex parts
# 1 2 3 4
# X ":" X "-"X ":"X
%evr_tuple_match ^(?:([^:-]+):)?([^:-]+)(?:-([^:-]+))?(?::([^:-]+))?$
into a LSB "standard" document.
And I'm perfectly prepared for
Requires: N = D:R-V:E
specifications, and adding a 101st tuple to the {E,V,R,D,......} set
too.
Bring it on! I dare you! 73 de Jeff
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
