On Jan 12, 2009, at 10:57 AM, devzero2000 wrote:
In rpmpopt.in, not macros.in. There already afaik. Yup, sorry. I have not checked today.
No reason you should know up to the minute. But flaws like these are exactly the sort of details that I'm likely to miss when backporting large changes from HEAD to the -r rpm-5_1 branch en masse.
Hmmm, --whatconflicts and --whatobsoletes need a bit more work however, todo++.
E.g. there are changes in macros.in and lib/query.c that need to be done in addition to wiring up the --whatconflicts and --whatobsoletes optionsfor full functionality. What I can't tell (yet) is whether full functionality onto the -r rpm-5_1 branch is desireable (or not). The feature is quite obscure,
and the behavior of erroring out is acceptable.What will almost certainly be reported as a flaw against rpm-5.1.7 is that
all dependency loops are now displayed to stderr. 73 de Jeff
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
