Not seeing this reflected ... apologies if duplicated. Begin forwarded message:
> From: Jeff Johnson <n3...@mac.com> > Date: June 23, 2010 12:35:59 PM EDT > To: rpm-devel@rpm5.org > Subject: Re: [CVS] RPM: popt/ CHANGES testit.sh > > > On Jun 23, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote: > >> Nice! >> > > On a more serious note ... > > POPT is just a "toy" library (in the sense that it is quite small). > > So its quite feasible to use POPT to design a means to automate > valgrind/callgrind/cachegrind/massif tools without much pain. > > If the design existed, I'd leap to using @rpm5.org in a flash. > I use all of those tools daily, largely from throw-away scriptie. > > And the "forward looking" issue (assuming a design for valgrind et al hooking > can be devised), would be to drill the mess directly into rpmbuild > %check. > > A non-trivial amount of work ... > > But POPT is poifect for figgering a design because its > a "toy" library. > > Just suggestions, feel free to do whatever ... > > 73 de Jeff > ______________________________________________________________________ RPM Package Manager http://rpm5.org Developer Communication List rpm-devel@rpm5.org
