On May 10, 2011, at 10:12 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote: > 2011/5/11 Jeff Johnson <n3...@mac.com>: >> This isn't your code. Leave it be. > Huh? > You don't want me to commit this change at all, or you just don't want > me to commit it on HEAD..?
I WANT TO HEAR UP FRONT WHAT YOU ARE ATTEMPTING BEFORE YOU DO IT. I DO NOT WANT TO BE BLIND SIDED BY RANDOME CHECK-INS WITHOUT ANY CLUE WHATSOEVER WHAT YOU ARE DOING. LAST WEEK IT WAS REMOVING COMMAS IN ENUMS. THIS WEEK ITS CASTS. WTF????? I HAVE SAID THIS BEFORE. > In the past you've told me to *always* commit to HEAD first.. YOU SOMEHOW SEE HEAD AS AN AVENUE TO THE PRODUCTION BRANCH. >> >> WTF does C++ typecasting have to do with anything? > > I am playing around with porting URPM to C++.. > I am NOT playing around. > You've expressed interest in being able to compile rpm with g++ > in the past, so I thought it'd be to your interest.. In fact -- if you read -- I tried and threw out the type casting attempting to get to C++ almost everywhere because it needs planning and thought. Its not just adding typecasts. I have already tried and decided not to without asking. You have not asked and decided to do whatever you wish. The consensus was NOT to switch to C++. I was in fact out-voted, I'd rather have started immediatley. I stopped switching from C -> C++ until planning and an incremental approach could be attempted. And this was _BEFORE_ "RPM ACID", which is where you are adding typecasts. If anything the code you have just added types casts to should _NEVER_ be seen by C++. >> >> Do we go through a repeat of last week? Again? > I don't get the problem... > See above. 73 de Jeff
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
