Platform I'm targeting support is F23+ so yes, but my solution looks better. Otherwise once I will add one more implementation I should update all packages..
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 7:23 PM Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Igor Gnatenko > <i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It is already implemented, but I'm thinking how to make better > dependencies > > on opencl realizations. For example, we have program which uses OpenCL, > but > > how we can provide to user one of implementations of OpenCL? First idea > > which comes to my mind to make Provides: opencl to all implementations > and > > Requires: opencl in this program, but it is not looks very good.. > > > > Does the platform you're targeting support the new rich dependencies? > If so, you could use that. > > For example: > > Requires: (opencl-imp1 or opencl-imp2 or opencl-imp3) > > > > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! > _______________________________________________ > Rpm-ecosystem mailing list > Rpm-ecosystem@lists.rpm.org > http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-ecosystem > -- -Igor Gnatenko
_______________________________________________ Rpm-ecosystem mailing list Rpm-ecosystem@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-ecosystem
