Michael Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 02:25:23PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: >> >> Michael, any idea what the case behind this patch was? It's not that I >> object to it or anything, I just have no clue what this is supposed to be >> doing :) > > I just asked Andreas Schwab, the guy who created the patch. He > said that it is needed so that one can translate relative pathnames > to absolute ones. (CC to Andreas, maybe he can shed some more light > on this.)
compilation directory + relative file name must be a valid file name, which can only be true when the compilation directory exits. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." _______________________________________________ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
