> > > The problem with that would be that RPM package file names for VFP > > and non-VFP packages would be identical. > > Sure, but remember rpm package file names don't actually mean anything > other then the name of the file. :) > > Just a suggestion.
IMHO the same as you forbid installing PPC package on i386; you should forbid installing an ARM VFP package on an ARM system without VFP. If you don't mark that package architecturally to be different than the soft-float version then mistakes are unavoidable. _______________________________________________ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
