On Sat, 29 Nov 2008, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > IMO, rpm should not adopt lzip support, unless lzip has proven to be > a functional and viable tool.
Many people think lzip has already proven that: http://lpar.ath0.com/2009/09/25/documentation-as-an-indicator-of-code-quality/ http://www.dragora.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=makepkg http://www.tuxradar.com/content/100-open-source-gems-part-2 http://packages.debian.org/sid/lzip Lzip is even used to distribute GNU packages on ftp.gnu.org. _______________________________________________ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
