>I'm actually going to be mildly surprised if there aren't any strange cases 
>we've missed wrt hard links or such :) Anyway, the patch looks as 
>obviously-correct as it gets within fsm. Applied, thanks for the patch!

Yeah, but I guess we will hopefully find it out soon, when we will be using 
the hooks :)

>Also with this patch in place, I think all the required bits and pieces for 
>moving the entire selinux support into a plugin are there now. Wohoo :)

This is actually my next question: how should we proceed? There are still some 
hooks (like handling conflicts and policy enforcement on signatures) that I 
would like to be present in rpm (I think other systems like SELinux might 
benefit from them too), and also we were thinking about rearranging the plugin 
initialization and etc.  Or should we first try to move the SELinux to plugin 
to verify that the basic set of hooks works for it?

Best Regards,
Elena.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to