On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 03:29:41PM +0100, Florian Festi wrote:
> On 02/29/2016 08:53 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > This protection is in the way if the --short-circuit -bb is used to
> > build packages for testing the effects of complex dependency changes
> > in a spec file.
>
> Would it be sufficient for your use case to change the anti-cheating
> Requires to something other than an rpmlib() that could actually
> provided by an "enable-cheating" package? Probbaly with adding the spec
> file of such a package to the documentation?
Or make the anti-cheating configurable with a rpm macro...
Cheers,
Michael.
--
Michael Schroeder m...@suse.de
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF Jeff Hawn, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg
main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);}
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
