On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 03:29:41PM +0100, Florian Festi wrote: > On 02/29/2016 08:53 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > This protection is in the way if the --short-circuit -bb is used to > > build packages for testing the effects of complex dependency changes > > in a spec file. > > Would it be sufficient for your use case to change the anti-cheating > Requires to something other than an rpmlib() that could actually > provided by an "enable-cheating" package? Probbaly with adding the spec > file of such a package to the documentation?
Or make the anti-cheating configurable with a rpm macro... Cheers, Michael. -- Michael Schroeder m...@suse.de SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF Jeff Hawn, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);} _______________________________________________ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint