Well changing header size limit needs a bit more thought. The main problem is that packages with bigger header will look broken on older rpm versions and the usual way of dealing with this (adding rpmlib() Requires) won't work it needs reading the header.
Also I wonder if we should increase the header size even more, to get rid of this topic for a longer time. I thought about 256MB which gives a 4 times increase over the 16MB. I am kinda tempted to go even further. Otoh the limit is there for a reason. And having rpm chew through one GB of broken data doesn't sound like a pleasant experience. Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Paul Argiry, Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill _______________________________________________ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
