Ehm, this looks very wrong to me: 
`Requires: (foo < 1 with foo > 1)`
Requires a package that does provide a version of foo smaller than 1 and at the 
same time a version of foo that is bigger than 1. That is not the same as  
`Requires: foo != 1`. `Requires: ( foo < 1 or foo > 1)` is.

Also I want to see an actual use case before even considering this.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/376#issuecomment-368469056
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to