FWIW: %optional is directly at odds with "reproducible" builds and does little
more than skip a hard error failure for no stated usage case.
Attributing this to rpm5.org is rather bogus: the %optional implementation is
nothing I remember seeing, and smells of Per Oyvind's wild hacking in
OpenMandriva.
But perhaps I am going senile ... Whatever.
Is there any reasonable usage case for marking a file %optional?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/417#issuecomment-373225097
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
