@ffesti
I thought the same thing as you at first but you don't absolutely need the
separate BuildRequires syntax. You can perfectly limit static BuildRequires to
the part needed to compute additional BuildRequires before `%build` and just
add any static BuildRequires needed for %build or %check to the output of this
computation.
(from a technical POW that's just putting those BuildRequires in an expand, and
cat >> the result to the dynamic BuildRequires file)
So, from a technical POW, sure the separate syntax would be nice to have, but
it's not absolutely *required*.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/104#issuecomment-432987623
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
