This just reveals how redefining of %_bindir (or I guess more correctly they're
redefining %_prefix) is not an ideal solution to the problem they're facing. I
honestly have no problem with specifying a full path in a build dependency in
the case that you can't for some reason specify a package dependency, but the
problem does go beyond that.
Unfortunately I don't see any general solution besides what's being proposed
here: different prefixes and path macros defined from them for different
contexts. Adding a "_system" seems as logical as any other.
I just hope that this kind of thing wouldn't get mass-pushed into packages and
instead used only where it's actually necessary.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/721#issuecomment-497393395
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
