Since requires in source rpms are buildrequires, with the same logic provides in source rpms are buildprovides, and what does a build provide if its not the names of the packages to be generated.
This seems like a natural fit, should be useful for various purposes, and eliminates the need for a special rpmspecQuery() with RPMQV_SPECBUILTRPMS to get that information. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/891 -- Commit Summary -- * Add NEVR provides for all packages that would be built into source rpms -- File Changes -- M build/parseSpec.c (11) M tests/data/SPECS/foo.spec (13) M tests/rpmspec.at (16) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/891.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/891.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/891
_______________________________________________ Rpm-maint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
