Possibly a straight up revert is the right thing to do. I was trying to keep
the intention of the previous patch as much as possible.
In terms of VFP/VFPv3 it is a requirement of ARMv8, but in theory (although I'm
not sure why you'd want to) you could have softfp builds on armv8 so to keep
compatibility with armv[567]l (softfp) vs armv[678]hl (hardfp) I think you'd
want to to keep those the same as a designator. For NEON it's a requirement on
armv8 so I think that would just be built if building armv8XX.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/946#issuecomment-557535551
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
