Rotational disks only hold us back if they're part of the transaction even in
this implementation, so I doubt that's a big issue.
Ultimately we'd want per-fs capability tracking to cover device- and
fs-specific issues, all the way down to fsm. That's one deep rabbit hole...
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/949#issuecomment-560407166
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
