> Also, we have a chunk of unused logic for Extras in here... Do we want to do
> something with it?
I'm uncertain. It looks like that was started as a means of packaging the
optional components in separate rpm packages. If that is completed, then it
would be necessary to relocate the code in this patch so that the sub-packages
"provide" the correct tag.
For now, though, I'd like to discuss whether or not we can include the optional
components in the "provide" metadata. If we add this data, then we can also
process the python package expression of dependencies on extras. Right now,
that information gets ignored.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1014#issuecomment-576997070
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
