@ignatenkobrain Three problems with it:
1. It would be regressive to current functionality for no good reason.
2. We don't have a way of distributing this in any kind of reasonable fashion
through rpm-extras.
3. IMO, That's not what rpm-extras is for. It's for staging things to
eventually integrate into rpm tree.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1070#issuecomment-586577952
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
