Wow, this is quite interesting and somewhat similar to things I've brainstormed
about for a number of years now I think that this has the possibility to
simplify packaging for a significant portion of at least the Fedora packaging
set.
However, one problem we've struggled with is that when you hide too much, it
becomes difficult for people to understand what to do when a package doesn't
fit the mold. Would it be possible for this to simply define defaults for
%build or %install or whatnot which would be used if those sections aren't
present in the specfile? That way it would be simpler to handle that one
package that needs a file removed after %make_install without having to
completely switch away from using the templates.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1087#issuecomment-591587210
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
