Yeah, I deleted that comment after realizing I misunderstood @voxik's question,
but thinking again, it really is not a bad idea at all! It would be easier than
having to redefine `%_macroshell` (or whatever we'd call it) and also cleaner,
as you say. It would also get rid of the problem with "how do we pass the
script body into a non-shell-like interpreter" that I mentioned above.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1334#issuecomment-675530398
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
