On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:14:20 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Should be pretty obvious really, starting with: it's a bit much to ask
> people to (possibly build and) install a whole another compiler just for
> a few test-cases that might not even concern them.
OK, sorry I forgot the upstream point of view. I was looking only at the
common distros like Fedora+SuSE but I agree there may exist some distro using
rpm which does not have /usr/bin/clang.
> Thanks. I agree gcc testing is not in your scope really, but wouldn't the
> same thing handle testing gcc just as easily?
Anyone can replace the line there if you think so:
-AT_SKIP_IF([test -n "$1" && ! which $1 ])
+AT_SKIP_IF([! which m4_if($1,,gcc,$1) ])
Jan
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1332#issuecomment-676039919
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
