An alternative approach: let's accept the fact that %_bindir=/usr/bin is here
to stay. Using a macro for "system binaries directory" is a legacy of old times
and we can just as well use the fixed path of "/usr/bin" for that everywhere.
(Using a macro for "where should I install my binaries", which can be /usr/bin
or something else in case of flatpaks, is a different story and is OK.)
> Specifying /usr/bin/foo in BRs is ugly as well (because what if base system
> is actually installed in different location).
I disagree. It's legible and perfectly fine. The system is not going to be
installed in a different location.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/721#issuecomment-698279250
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
