> > There's ample potential for bikeshedding here (eg what to call the global
> > table)
>
> Indeed :) `m` is nice and short, but possibly a bit too much? What about
> including it in the `rpm` namespace as `rpm.m`?
I agree with @hroncok. I think the code should be readable on the first place.
`m` does not add to readability. Not mentioning if somebody wants to find
reference using search engine.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1398#issuecomment-707664516
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
