> Oh, I've been alerted by @torsava that my suggestions have been addressed. 
> Nice, thanks! The code looks good to me. If the external tests still pass, 
> let's ship it?
> 
> We can probably test this in Fedora before merging if we want more testing 
> (but this is not necessary).
> 
> Thank you @s-t-e-v-e-n-k!

I'd prefer to merge it here, we've delayed the PR long enough :) We'll test it 
in Fedora in any case, and we can address possible issues later.

Thank you @s-t-e-v-e-n-k for having patience with us :)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1317#issuecomment-724772529
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to