> I'd love to hear real explanation first, because I think that the report you
> have made was misunderstood
@voxik for your above comment on our chat about my report here, I think it's
better to explain it here. Dees the real explanation mean @pmatilai 's answer
about why the RPM project dropped `{?load:foo}`, right? What was misunderstand
by people in RPM project here?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1669#issuecomment-839075139_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
