> Well, the sub directory is mainly there so placing specparts on older
> rpmbuild versions will fail and they won't just be silently ignored.
Yup, I got that.
> What about SPECPARTS as dir name.
It's loud, but at least it's to the point. Add a %_specpartsdir macro, point it
to that and we can move forward. We still got several months to change it if a
better name comes to us in a flash of brilliance :laughing:
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1485#issuecomment-1291906218
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1485/c1291906...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
