> For backward-compatibility and to avoid surprises, default to building x86_64
> even on v2+ capable machines.
> Tested by running rpm --eval %_target_cpu and using rpmbuild with various
> BuildArch values on a x86_64_v3 host.
Looks like my fix for the platform macros generation broke that part a bit.
While with `BuildArch: x86_64_v3` it spits out an `x86_64_v3` RPM, it uses the
`x86_64` optflags still. The only way to end up with `x86_64_vX` optflags is by
using `--target x86_64_vX`. What's the best way to end up with better semantics?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2315#issuecomment-1344303671
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2315/c1344303...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
