Unlike #2390, this doesn't change the bit-level value so it's backwards compatible, this is just for eliminating compiler level ambiguity. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2391 -- Commit Summary -- * Move RPMTAG_NOT_FOUND out of the rpmTag enum into a macro * Fix rpmTagGetValue() error return documentation * Define RPMTAG_NOT_FOUND in uint32_t terms -- File Changes -- M include/rpm/rpmtag.h (5) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2391.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2391.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2391 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2...@github.com>
_______________________________________________ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
