Both #1532 and #607 seem to touch on the same subject.
I'm not opposed at all in principle, the question is more in the details:
should the info be in the header of each binary package, or would a
buildinfo-style file/subpackage (with a strong identifier tying it to the same
build) be enough? The latter allows more flexibility for those who don't need
the stuff.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2389#issuecomment-1425406909
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2389/1425406...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
