Yeah, it seems like the proposed `%rpmversion` macro would indeed be a good fit
for SPEC syntax changes in general. Having a separate version for the SPEC
format might perhaps come in handy in the future, too, but not sure.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2523#issuecomment-1566996739
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2523/1566996...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
