The name should imply this is a per-spec thing, so I don't think "find" is
good. "local" is much better, but in rpm context I tend to associate that with
"this host" rather than per package.
"spec" seems accurate, because it is a per-spec thing. But then that makes me
think of dependencies of the spec itself. Which may even be a thing one day
(technically, they do have parse-requirements which often is different from
build-requirements).
How about just "package"? (%__package_requires, %__package_provides etc). That
seems very much to the point too: these are specific to this package.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2734#issuecomment-1778627591
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2734/c1778627...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
