Yeah, I'd have assumed the same thing actually, that's why it was weird to me
to see `!=` wasn't acting as a complement of `==` :sweat_smile:(now I've just
found why that was intended [0]). I guess that it just implements a `is not` by
default? I'm not sure.
No problem, thank you for the quick reply!
[0] https://peps.python.org/pep-0207/#proposed-resolutions (point 3)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2838#issuecomment-1886833169
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2838/c1886833...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
