> > There are a few memleak fixes
>
> Oh, you mean (some commits from) #2879. Indeed, I somehow ignored this whole
> PR due to it starting with "Add support for ..." 😄 I'll look at those patches
> and see if cherry picking at least some of them would make sense, thanks.
Yup, those. OTOH you could just as well pick the entire PR because the "add
support" is only a developer/CI feature - one could argue memory leaks + the
like are *more* important for stable releases than development ones.
> > * maybe the unsigned buildtime thing that might be worth considering too.
>
> If you mean commit
> [97aa64d](https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/97aa64d8281974fb369c66d5aef8650515b89c52),
> that one is included in this PR. Or was there some other patch, too?
Oh, ack, just missed that (was looking at the highlights more than actual
commits it seems :sweat_smile: (
>
> > Although, there's always the next release, so up to you.
>
> Agreed in general. These micro-micro releases are supposed to be rather small
> so that we can produce them more often.
:+1:
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2888#issuecomment-1929050465
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2888/c1929050...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
