@Tojaj either that or just stuff a `type: (rpm|srpm)` attribute to the repo
object to make it clear upfront. The attribute could be optional defaulting to
'rpm' so you'd only ever need it for srpm to again avoid cluttering the file
with a supposedly redundant information in 85%~ use cases.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2908#discussioncomment-8466516
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
<rpm-software-management/rpm/repo-discussions/2908/comments/8466...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
