> Well, I stuck to the names that were in the code...

I know. My not-so-thoroughly thought up names from 10+ years ago, and a fine 
example of why not to leave such half-assed pieces laying around in the 
codebase :laughing: 

> It also uses "--delete" while rpm itself uses "--erase". Not sure if that is 
> good because it is a slightly different operation or bad because it is 
> inconsistent. Opinions?

I'm quite sure I chose the names for familiarity from gpg, which has 
--list-keys and --delete-keys.
I always quite disliked the "erase" terminology in rpm anyhow.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2921#issuecomment-1958879565
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2921/c1958879...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to