> So it looks to me like it is not reclaiming the space during --delsign. Where
> or why do we disagree?
>
> It looks to me like the reservation is hard coded. So as long as the rpm that
> was used to build and the one that was used to --delsign is the same it
> should be able to guarantee it, right?
Except for a bare minimum, the reservation is macro configurable, so it can be
anything at all. And that's why it cannot possibly *guarantee* to restore it.
In an arbitrary situation that is.
When the signature fits in the original reservation then it should restore it
to original condition though. So like I said, there's something very wonky
here. As in, it's a bug or more likely, regression.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2965#issuecomment-2003939553
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2965/2003939...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
