We discussed this at some length, and actually the current behavior seems
correct.
Nosource items are not managed by rpm in any way: they don't get pulled into
src.rpm's, and if you want to rebuild an src.rpm utilizing nosources, you need
to manually copy any nosource items in place. It's then only consistent that
rpm doesn't remove them either.
Plus, by definition they are non-sources, so it seems consistent with that as
well.
This just needs to be documented.
Thanks for the report btw.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3037#issuecomment-2074454785
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3037/2074454...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint