We discussed this at some length, and actually the current behavior seems 
correct.

Nosource items are not managed by rpm in any way: they don't get pulled into 
src.rpm's, and if you want to rebuild an src.rpm utilizing nosources, you need 
to manually copy any nosource items in place. It's then only consistent that 
rpm doesn't remove them either.
Plus, by definition they are non-sources, so it seems consistent with that as 
well.
This just needs to be documented.

Thanks for the report btw.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3037#issuecomment-2074454785
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3037/2074454...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to