> Oh, nice. Didn't look at details yet but the functionality is pretty
> desperately needed indeed. The current behavior of just bailing out if main
> keyid is already there predates the subkey support by many years and was only
> ever intended as a stop-gap behavior until something better gets done. Well,
> here we are, finally 👍
>
> @nwalfield , thoughts from rpm-sequoia POV (or otherwise)?
I'll take a look the start of next week. From a very high-level perspective:
yes, we want to merge certificates. So, thanks a lot for working on this
@mlschroe!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3083#issuecomment-2104486277
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3083/c2104486...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
