> I strongly oppose ASCII armor, as it injects a lot of additional malliability.
What does that even mean?
It is just a format with no ambiguity in representation.
Given the current code wants ASCII I would definitely just use the ASCII
Armored signature directly and avoid the silly step. I see no need to force a
binary representation.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3385#issuecomment-2509132731
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3385/[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
