MillaFleurs left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#4202)

I built this on CentOS and tested against the POC from my original bug report.

Detalis of my build VM are below:

```
## Host OS
NAME              CentOS Stream 10 (Coughlan)
VERSION_ID        10
PLATFORM_ID       platform:el10
CPE               cpe:/o:centos:centos:10
KERNEL            6.12.0-224.el10.x86_64 (x86_64)

## RPM source
Repository        https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm.git
Branch            master
Commit            5c56e69e5078bbbceffbfccf14c4c11642ba25d9
                  ("Bump rpm-sequoia requirement to >= 1.10.2")
Patched file      lib/fsm.cc
Patch             bugs/patch.diff (applied to working tree, not committed)
Built version     RPM 6.0.90

## Build configuration
Build system      CMake (out-of-tree, _build/)
Configure cmd     cmake ..
Build cmd         make -j$(nproc)
Source location   /home/dan/code/rpm
Build location    /home/dan/code/rpm/_build

## Toolchain (from CentOS Stream 10 BaseOS / AppStream)
cmake             3.31.8
gcc               14.3.1 20251022 (Red Hat 14.3.1-4)
g++               14.3.1 20251022 (Red Hat 14.3.1-4)
GNU make          4.4.1
python3           3.12.13
lua               5.4.8
scdoc             1.11.3 (from EPEL)
podman            5.8.2 (only used to run the upstream test-suite)

## -devel packages (for building rpm)
All sourced from CentOS Stream 10 dnf repos as listed:

  baseos                CentOS Stream 10 - BaseOS               (default)
  appstream             CentOS Stream 10 - AppStream            (default)
  extras-common         CentOS Stream 10 - Extras packages      (default)
  crb                   CentOS Stream 10 - CRB                  (enabled 
manually:
                                                                 `dnf 
config-manager
                                                                  --set-enabled 
crb`)
  epel                  EPEL 10 (epel-release)                  (only for scdoc)
 ```

**Note:** As discussed in main issue this was discovered using the [N184 Bug 
and Vulnerability Scanner(https://github.com/MillaFleurs/N184).  While AI was 
consulted, ultimately the reports and code are mine.



-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/4202#issuecomment-4384321404
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/4202/[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to