Hey Folks. I wasn't subscribed here until now, so sorry for the delay... >On 30.10.2007 17:43, Matthias Saou wrote: > Hi, > > The CVS server that Kevin set up is now interfaced with the FDS > (Fedora Directory Server) for user accounts. No FAS (Fedora Account > System) for the near future (*), but at least accounts are > centralised in the LDAP, not the SSH keys just yet, but that should > be trivial to do. > > The following users have access already : > > firewing > jwrdegoede > kwizart > musuruan > salimma > scop > thias > thl > > It's accessible as follows : > > export CVSROOT=:ext:username at cvs.rpmfusion.org:/cvs/pkgs > cvs co rpms > > I'm pretty sure it won't work because some groups still need to be > set... ah, the wonders of CVS! Kevin : Will you take care of that? Do > we need fine grained access using extended attributes for instance?
All those folks will need to be in the cvsextras group (504).
Should I just add them locally on that machine? Or do you want to set
that as their group in FDS?
> Matthias
>
> (*) Fedora currently uses FAS1 which is considered obsolete, so it
> would be a waste of effort to implement it, and FAS2 is still being
> worked on, and nowhere near a usable state. But since we're using FDS,
> it should be easy-ish to migrate to FAS2 once it's released, then also
> to use pkgdb.
Cool.
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote :
> Just wondering: will we use one root for both free and nonfree? Or
> should we better separate them with
>
> export CVSROOT=:ext:username at cvs.rpmfusion.org:/cvs/free
> and
> export CVSROOT=:ext:username at cvs.rpmfusion.org:/cvs/nonfree
>
> Separating sounds like the better way if we ever start things like
> {replacements,nosrc,latestfoo,somethingstupid,whatever}.rpmfusion.org
> in the long term.
Sure, we can do that I think. Might require some mods to scripts.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
