On 03.11.2007 17:59, KH KH wrote: > 2007/11/3, Richi Plana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> That's an aim! In my case the "kwizart" repository is targeted to be > usable with Fedora (and/or) livna/rpmfusion. That's an "experimental" > repository which means that packages are working but still need some > work/testing to be submitted in Fedora or Rpmfusion /me hopes we can have such a "experimental" repo in rpmfusion soon. > [...] >> It would be nice (to start) if there could be a master database that all >> 3rd-party repos could consult for their packages. To see what might >> conflict with what. Sort of like a distributed 3rd-party repo system. >> The bittorrent / p2p app system for 3rd-party Fedora apps, as it were. >> How about tacking on that proposal to the wiki and if someone with time >> and skill finds it interesting ... > To be sure, only Fedora officials repositories and RPMFusion will be > compatible with the RPMFusion set of packages... BTW, did we agree on RPM Fusion or RPMFusion? I think it was "RPM Fusion". > Then we can have a distinction with: > [...] > - Repositories that do not uses rpmfusion as a dependencies and should > work with Fedora (probably google and adobe) > [...] That why I actually edited the wiki already before in parallel to your post and moved the flash repo into a special section. Andrea moved the google repo into that section as well. IOW: hint, it's a wiki ;-) Cu knurd
