Hans de Goede wrote : > Richi Plana wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 22:00 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> I've looked at merging the libdvdcss packages. This is not necessary as > >> both > >> are identical, except that livna still includes a static lib in the -devel > >> package which should be removed. > > > > Why remove the static libs (.a)? Are they going to go to a separate > > package? And is this an rpmfusion policy? > > No they will be removed because static libs are no good, and this is not a > rpmfusion policy but a Fedora one, and where applicapable we follow Fedora > policies.
And libdvdcss is dlopen()ed from everywhere anyway, right? Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) - Linux kernel 2.6.23.1-10.fc7 Load : 0.08 0.06 0.11
