On 24.11.2007 13:06, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> As I said, I don't want to do that: > I understand, but I just wanted to verify it /would/ work, not to > discuss implementing it. [...]
I know it works, and just rechecked on F7, where the groups from the livna repo has the same name and id like the ones from Fedora. >>>> I doubt filling a bug against yum will help. Fedora likely will tell us >>>> to use the same group-id then Fedora. I'd like to avoid that, as it will >>>> be harder for people to find RPM Fusions packages. And there are >>>> problems in anaconda as well, as you will get packages marked as >>>> "<packagereq type="default">" only if you unselected and reselect a group. > How about a separate category for RPM Fusion packages? You would need to > try to not use the same group.name, and not the same group.groupid. > Sounds reasonable and doable, don't you think? > > Again, just an idea / my $0.02 Sorry, but again we are going in circles (some typos fixed): >>> As you can see, I gave a RPM Fusion specific ID (and group; see at the >>> bottom of the page), but used the same <name> as in Fedora, which IMHO >>> should be a valid thing to do, but is the reason for the problem. >>> >>> We could work around the problem by adding " (from RPM Fusion)" to the >>> "<name>Games and Entertainment</name>" line. Then yum would work, but >>> that would look ugly and redundant in pirut. Does anyone have a better >>> idea how to solve the issue? CU knurd