I understood that z00dax of centos.karan.org was in RPM repo. Funny thing is i'm hosting centos.karan.org just on the same server as rpm.livna.org and upcoming rpmfusion repo :)
He's a good m8, if you want i can ask him to join/talk with us ? Le jeudi 29 novembre 2007 à 11:40 -0700, Richi Plana a écrit : > On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 19:18 +0100, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > > 2007/11/29, Richi Plana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Is there any work between RPMFusion and RPMRepo > > > (http://www.rpmrepo.org/) in making sure that the packages they release > > > work well together? Or, at the very least, packages from one don't > > > conflict with the other (AND Fedora)? Perhaps while both attempts are at > > > their infancy, steps could be made so that the possibility of collusion > > > down the line won't be made impossible. > > > > Some of the packager of RPM Repo were asked to join RPM Fusion but > > they had different plans. > > Sometimes it's impossible (or at least improbable) for projects to join. > The reasons vary including personal pride, differences in opinion or > philosophy, technical or even logistical reasons. That said ... > > > Since this question comes to this list frequently, I wonder if we > > should say something somewhere in the wiki. > > It would be great for the end-user if they/we could be made aware of > where two major players like RPMRepo and RPMFusion differ as well as > where they follow the similar rules. End-users must decide how to treat > both parties, and in most cases will opt to choose both. It would help > the end-user decide which package to use from which repo given that > he/she is aware of the differences in the options. > > In that sense, yes, a wiki documenting these "different plans" would be > a good idea. Who knows? Perhaps the two might not be so different after > all. > -- > > Richi Plana >
