2008/5/5 KH KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/5/5 Hans de Goede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Xavier Lamien wrote: > > > > > 2008/5/4 Ian Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > Just a quick note to those who it concerns that Dribble is now > frozen > > and > > > > no new updates or packages will be permitted there. Most > contributors > > are > > > > migrating their packages to RPM Fusion, including most of mine. > Thanks > > very > > > > much and I wish RPM Fusion the best of luck. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot Ian, > > > > > > I think dribble will be the first to merge in next couple of days, as > we > > > have a clean frozen version of packages set. > > > > > > Hans give a signal for cvssync. > > > > > > > > > > Xavier, > > > > We (Dribble) don't have a CVS, given the low package count and churn > we've > > always been passing Ian srpms to build. > > > > So in order to get dribble's packages into rpmfusion cvs / look a side, > > someone would need to go to: > > http://dribble.org.uk/listrpms4.html > > > > Create cvs modules for all srpms listed there and then use cvs-import > on > > the srpms linked from there to populate the cvs modules. > > > > Owners for the modules can be found here: > > http://rpmfusion.org/InitialPackageMerge > > > > But I guess all owners first need to have a FAS account, so maybe now > would > > be a good moment to send a mail to the list asking everyone to create a > FAS > > account? > > > > Hmm, I just realized that creating cvs modules isn't that easy because > we > > first need to decide on a package for package base wether it goes to > > non-free or free. > > > > So what are the rules for free? I would like to suggest the following: > > > > "free: anything of which all components are under a license which is > listed > > as > > good on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing > > > > Notice that free fully follows this webpage except that chapter 6 > > "Software > > Types" is ignored. > > > > Notice that anything depending upon anything in non-free must be in > > non-free > > itself." > > > > Can everyone live with this? If we can agree this is the rule for the > > non-free free split, then I can make a list of which packages in dribble > > should go where. > > Hi ! > I agree from this. I just want to notice that "-nonfree" expects at > least the package to be redistributable. > I don't expect dribble have such packages. But amr{nb,wb} codecs are > ( altought opensource - we even cannot retristribute the sources). > For such cases i guess it would be desirable to have nosrc.rpm in the > SRPMS non-free section. > http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/nosrc/amrnb-7.0.0.0-1.nosrc.rpm > http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/nosrc/amrwb-7.0.0.2-1.nosrc.rpm > I will request a review if allowed. > > Also all packages that can go to Fedora shouldn't be allowed in RPM > Fusion. > ( I have submitted some perl package freshrpms use for dvdrip at least) > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444733 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444744 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444745 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444755 > I don't know if this can concern some p2p programs that are > problematic in some country...
It could, so you should take this in account first. -- Xavier.t Lamien -- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB
